What to know about the Perkins County Canal

Nebraska and Colorado are at odds over the Perkins County Canal project that would bring water from Colorado to Nebraska. Here are the details of the project and what's in store.

Colorado and Nebraska differ over the planned Perkins County Canal (Photos by Fred Knapp, Nebraska Public Media News)
Colorado and Nebraska differ over the planned Perkins County Canal (Photos by Fred Knapp, Nebraska Public Media News)

Perkins County Canal FAQ

What is the Perkins County Canal project?

The Perkins County Canal project is a plan to build a canal to carry water from the South Platte River near Ovid, Colorado to western Nebraska, where it would be stored in reservoirs, and eventually returned to the river near Paxton, Nebraska.

Why does Nebraska want it?

Nebraska says it needs to build the canal to prevent Colorado from using all the water in the river before it reaches Nebraska.

Why is Colorado resisting it?

Colorado says Nebraska is overreacting to what is simply a wish list of possible water projects in Colorado, and that building the canal would deprive farmers in northeast Colorado of needed irrigation water.

What will it cost, and who’s going to pay for it?

Nebraska has so far set aside $628 million in state funds, largely received from the federal government during the COVID-19 pandemic, for the project.

How long has Nebraska wanted to build the canal?

Then-Gov. Pete Ricketts proposed the latest version of project in 2022. But it's a revival of a project that originally started in the 1890s, until builders ran out of money. Permission for Nebraska to build the canal was given in an interstate compact between Nebraska and Colorado in 1923, and the idea was again studied in the 1980s.

What is the South Platte River Compact?

The South Platte River Compact is an agreement between Colorado and Nebraska signed in 1923. It essentially requires Colorado to assure a flow of 120 cubic feet of water per second into Nebraska during the irrigation season, April 1 to Oct. 15. It also allows Nebraska to divert 500 cubic feet per second from Colorado into Nebraska during the non-irrigation season, but only if Nebraska builds the Perkins County Canal.

Why is a 100-year-old compact suddenly coming up?

Nebraska officials say the state must assure that growth in Colorado will not decrease flows into Nebraska in the future. They are invoking the compact’s promise that Nebraska can be assured 500 cubic feet of water per second in the non-irrigation season if it builds the Perkins County Canal.

What do landowners in the canal’s path have to say?

So far, Colorado landowners have refused Nebraska’s offer to buy land near Ovid, Colorado where the canal would begin. Nebraska has the right, under an interstate compact with Colorado, to use eminent domain to take the land. It has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify how to assert that right.

What’s happening in the court system?

Nebraska has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that Colorado has violated the compact, both by not delivering enough water in the non-irrigation season, and by preventing Nebraska from building the Perkins County Canal. Colorado has said it is abiding by the compact.

How long will the debate last?

There’s no way of telling. Nebraska previously said it could have the canal up and running by 2028. Then, after it sued Colorado, it said that could take until 2032.

Map showing location of proposed Perkins County Canal (Nebraska Public Media Graphic)
The location of the proposed Perkins County Canal. (Nebraska Public Media Graphic)
Jim Pillen

“They want it all. They have no interest in anything being fair in this.”

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen


Colorado Gov Jared Polis

“Know this: We will continue to protect and aggressively assert Colorado’s water rights under all existing water compacts.”

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis


Mike Hilgers

“There's a disagreement between Nebraska and Colorado as to even where to start”

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers


Phil Weiser

“When the dust finally settles, likely over a billion dollars will have been spent—tens of millions of that on litigation alone—and no one in Nebraska or Colorado will be better off."

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser


Alex Lasater

"There might be more efficient ways to provide Nebraska with water it needs. And the gold standard today may not be a canal. It was the only option in the 20s, but it may not be viable in 2025.”

Alex Lasater, Colorado landowner


Jason Ullman.jpg

“In Colorado, we continue to meet and listen to our water users about their concerns regarding the project…There’s a lot of concern about the impacts of this project.”

Colorado State Engineer Jason Ullman


Jane Raybould Cropped.jpg

“I think Nebraska really needs to up their game, their legal game. Otherwise, this is going to be such a protracted and very long legal battle."

Jane Raybould, Nebraska State Senator


Jay Goddard.jpg

“It could affect the economy of these small towns drastically. If you lose some of the irrigation, obviously you're going to lose families…. Those things just kind of steamroll."

Jay Goddard, Colorado landowner