Midwest Farm Groups Greet Pruitt With Cheers Over WOTUS, Jeers On Ethanol Delay
By Grant Gerlock, Harvest Public Media
June 15, 2018, 12:07 p.m. ·
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt’s message to Midwestern farmers this week is a mixed bag, telling them that the agency will be changing an Obama-era rule regarding water regulations but is pausing a plan to expand summer sales of ethanol.
While Thursday evening’s meeting in Lincoln, Nebraska, was polite, the reception in other states has not been as welcoming, especially when it comes to his ethanol policies. Corn farmers have been venting their frustration through billboards and rallies, including in South Dakota, where The Associated Press reported some farmers drove tractors to an anti-Pruitt rally that took place at the same time he held a meeting with other producers.
Pruitt, who has deep ties to the oil and gas industry and has been dogged by ethics questions, also has made enemies in Corn Belt senators like Iowa Republicans Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, who are looking to protect their constituencies’ markets.
More stories from NET News and Harvest Public Media:
- What Netflix and Net Neutrality could mean for slow internet in small towns
- Fearing deportation, unauthorized immigrants shy away from signing kids up for federal food aid
- Expanding work requirements for food assistance at the center of farm bill debate
- Serving and hungry: How a federal rule keeps some military members from food aid
- Obtaining federal food aid takes time, patience
- Crop insurance is different from car insurance, and keeps some farms in business
Grassley has said Pruitt's policies undermine President Donad Trump's stated commitment to ethanol. “This is a case where the president is being ill-served by political-appointees that aren’t carrying out his agenda,” Grassley said earlier this month.
But Pruitt seems to be banking on support of replacing the Obama-era Waters of the United States Rule (WOTUS) — a longtime goal of his. As Oklahoma’s attorney general, he led a multi-state lawsuit challenging the regulation.
In Lincoln, he said the new definition of federal waters, now under review by the White House, will be scaled back.
“We’ve actually went (sic) to the text of the statute and gone to the case law and asked ourselves, ‘What did Congress intend with respect to what a waters of the United States is?’” Pruitt told the gathering in the boardroom of the Nebraska Farm Bureau. “And I can tell you they didn’t intend it to be a puddle, a dry creek bed or an ephemeral drainage ditch.”
Some agriculture-industry representatives vilified WOTUS during the Obama administration, claiming farmers would have to unnecessarily follow strict EPA regulations. Environmental advocates, however, worry that a limited version of WOTUS would leave wetlands vulnerable to development and allow more water pollution. George Cunningham, an aquatic ecologist and Conservation Chair with the Nebraska Sierra Club, also said it would “lead to massive habitat changes (affecting) hundreds of species, ultimately leading to species endangerment.”
Corn farmers in the room were pleased to hear about the EPA’s WOTUS rewrite, but didn’t respond well when Pruitt said a plan to expand ethanol sales over the summer months remains on hold.
Farm groups have been pushing the EPA to allow E15, a 15 percent blend of ethanol with gasoline to be sold year-round. It’s currently restricted over the summer months because of concerns with air quality. Pruitt said he supports year-round E15 and that the EPA has a proposal ready to go, but he said he has been told to hold off, though he didn’t say by whom.
That frustrated corn farmer Dan Wesely of Morse Bluff, Nebraska, who expected more support for ethanol from the Trump administration.
“He should come forward and say, ‘You know, we’re going to get this process through. We’re going to get it by next summer,’” said Wesely, who is also president of the Nebraska Corn Growers Association. “The longer it gets drawn out, the trust factor is hurt a little bit.”
The EPA has granted hardship waivers to oil refineries, some owned by large corporations like Andeavor, exempting them from a portion of their obligations under the ethanol mandate. Some of those exemptions prompted the National Farmers Union, the National Corn Growers Association, the Renewable Fuels Association and the American Coalition for Ethanol to file a lawsuit over the waivers.
Pruitt claimed in Lincoln that any waivers granted to refineries fit the guidelines of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), the law that sets ethanol policy.
Nathan Brabec, who works at the Louis Dreyfus ethanol plant in Norfolk, Nebraska, is worried that waivers water down ethanol production targets.
“He made valid points but at the end of the day, we’ve got to meet the RFS,” Brabec said.
Meanwhile, a proposal favored by corn producers to make certain blends of ethanol available year-round remains on the shelf.
Harvest Public Media is a reporting collaboration focused on issues of food, fuel and ﬁeld. Harvest covers these agriculture-related topics through an expanding network of reporters and partner stations throughout the Midwest.